I get asked, daily, about Urban sprawl. I understand people’s concerns; it certainly appears that Edmonton has “Sprawled” haphazardly. People in Ward Five are particularly worried because we have so much available Land in the South West of the Zone.
I will address some of the City of Edmonton’s current
responses to minimize future sprawl. I am in support of ALL of these attempts
to direct growth into existing neighbourhoods and I plan to simplify City
Zoning and Ordinances to allow for faster approval of new high density housing
(as long as it meets all of the appropriate requirements) and as long as the
housing does not infringe on Edmonton’s Green Spaces.
Firstly let’s talk about some facts. Edmonton’s current
population according to the capital region board is 827,512. In 2018 it is
estimated that it will be 900,833. In 2028 it will be 1,019,420. This is
Edmonton alone NOT including the remainder of the Capital Region. http://capitalregionboard.ab.ca/-/reports/appendix1_population_e.pdf
This means that, realistically, within 5 years we have to
make space for 80,000 new people. Keep that number in mind.
The city of Edmonton is currently engaged in a number of
creative processes to increase infill in usable land in existing neighbourhoods.
Here are a few.
The City has created a program that recycles old school
spaces (used or never used) and turns them into “First place” homes, seniors
centers and others, as yet not decided. Please see the following: http://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/urban_planning_and_design/surplus-school-building-sites.aspx
Grey circles represent new senior’s centres; Red circles “First
Place” centres and green are undecided. (I have downloaded and rejigged these
images). I would like to insert an aside here that the city seems a little gung
ho about rezoning green spaces and frankly we need green spaces so I will look into
whether we are being too aggressive with this program). For now, however, let’s
say that these 36 sites, combined manage to house, say, 10,000 people.
Now let’s look at some other new developments. In the next image, the top Orange shape is the Airport Lands
(and I quote from the website) “The associated residential population was
established to be in the order of 24,286 people.” http://www.edmonton.ca/blatchfordedmonton/documents/Airport-Land-Market-Impact-Assessment.pdf#xml=http://search1.edmonton.ca/texis/ThunderstoneSearchService/pdfhi.txt?query=airport+lands&pr=www.edmonton.ca&prox=page&rorder=750&rprox=250&rdfreq=0&rwfreq=0&rlead=750&rdepth=0&sufs=0&order=r&cq=&id=5224eaea7
The bottom Orange square is Century Park, known as a “Transit Oriented Development”
because there is LRT nearby, which will house between 5,000 and 10,000 people. The Orange circle is the new high-rise downtown, the Pearl, which will supply housing
for (my estimate based on the website) 350 people. Add a few similar new
ventures.
That means that within five years these developments and a
few others will achieve, roughly, numbers in the range of 40,000 to 50,000 people (Please feel free to
correct me if my numbers are off). So we have approximately 30,000 people that we do not know
what to do with.
So my simple question is: where shall we put all of these
people if not for houses? Well, we need more high density housing but sometimes that
can take years or even decades to get off the ground. We need to simplify and speed up city processes that will allow for
more high density housing, especially where close to existing and planned LRT
lines. This must be council’s priority. I am committed, fully and completely committed,
to doing everything reasonable to help draw people into the center of the city.
The new Arena will help. The Galleria will help. Expanded LRT service will
help. Making more housing available will also keep the cost lower which will
help dramatically. And more people make life in the center more entertaining,
creating more of a draw.
Eventually the draw to the core, itself, will be “The Core”.
We are close, another couple years and we won’t need incentives. It will just
draw people in.
Now, for part two, minimizing sprawl in new Urban areas.
While I will try to minimize sprawl there will always be an argument
for new housing. Many new immigrants, young families and others want houses. These
people deserve the same rights to homes that our parents and grandparents had. Let’s
not forget, while many decry new growth, our ancestors came here for the dream
of better lives; a home for children in a safe, clean, free democratic country.
Not all of our new immigrants can afford apartments downtown. New developments
are usually more affordable and more spacious for large families.
I could never deny a newcomer the right to their own home.
But as a councillor, I will do my best to assure that those homes are being
built in well designed neighborhoods with green spaces, properly designed
schools, reasonable amenities, bike paths and access to mass transit ready when
they arrive. As I mentioned before, my ancestors came here for a better life. I
honour their memory by trying to make that same, better life available to the
people that choose to join us and share our wonderful city and province.
As your councillor I
will do everything I can to make Edmonton a greener, more urban, sustainable
city by finding every means available to draw people to a higher density core.
At the same time, I accept that our growth requires a certain number of new
houses and that the people who choose those houses deserve equal access to
amenities.
Thanks for looking at the population growth/housing issue so closely and practically. You are correct, a lot of those proposed "infill" developments encroach on existing green spaces. Besides the aesthetic, recreational, and biodiversity benefits of green spaces, we need to preserve such spaces because they are not impervious to rainfall (such as parking lots) thereby keeping the new reality of heavy storms from flooding our already taxed drainage system. Each green space should be evaluated by various metrics such as size, local topography/drainage, forest/plant cover, soil quality, etc. to determine if it is suitable for rezoning and development into senior's centres or "first place" centres. Ideally, the City should look at the redevelopment of brownfields and somehow getting derelict developments redeveloped into high density housing. I hope you will also help council look at the impediments to bicycling from and to the further flung areas, namely the Henday basically cuts off bicyclists and historically the Yellowhead trail/CN rail has had the same effect which is still not remedied. North Edmonton cyclists are discouraged far more than south Edmonton cyclists.
ReplyDelete